NorthPoint Pets team

How to Ensure Quality and Transparency in Pet Products

The Importance of Transparency in the Pet Industry

Transparency is a buzzword that has been used frequently in recent years, especially by companies within the pet industry. However, it’s important to note that transparency is not just a feel-good term – it’s a crucial aspect that should be present in all pet products, including food and supplements. The lack of transparency in the pet industry can have severe consequences for both pets and their owners.

The Dangers of Poor Transparency

Many pet products, including food and supplements, lack transparency, quality control, and accountability. This means that there may be toxins, poor sourcing, and formulation errors that can potentially harm pets. In the past, there have been recalls of pet food and supplements due to vitamin D and melamine recalls, pathogen recalls, and other contamination and formulation issues.

The Lack of Accountability and Standards in the Pet Industry

Pet food and supplement manufacturers often cut corners and do not do their due diligence because there are no set standards and accountability measures in place. Major organizations such as the FDA, AAFCO, WSAVA, and PNA have minimal standards, and these standards can be influenced by corporate funding. As a result, it’s often difficult for these organizations to police everyone all the time.

There are minimal requirements for foods, supplements, and other pet products to come to market. Some organizations allow these products to come to market without any adequacy testing, digestibility, or feeding trials. Unfortunately, animals often become sick or die before red flags are raised and an investigation is initiated. This underscores the need for more transparency and accountability in the pet industry.

reading a pet food ingredient label

Ask Questions Verifying Pet Food Quality:

  • Do you conduct a 3rd party nutrition analysis on all of your finished products?
    • Do your products meet an AAFCO profile?
    • Are you willing to provide a copy of that analysis? Note that most companies are deceptive and provide Target analysis, which is predicted. This does not equal a typical analysis, be careful
  • Do you conduct 3rd party digestibility studies for each of your formulas?
    • Do you make those publicly available?
  • Do you source any ingredients from China? Are you willing to provide certificates of origin? 
    • Note that ingredients from China are not necessarily bad as long as they are well-sourced, they are ensuring and verifying quality and purity via analysis and contamination testing. 
  • Do you complete analysis of your final product to ensure the formulation is correct and ensure there are not any contamination issues?

Keep in mind that digestibility and typical nutrient analysis mean nothing without the other. Digestibility shows the amount of nutrients absorbed. The analysis shows the amount of nutrients contained within a product.

Beware of the word proprietary – this does not hold a strong argument and may imply a lack of testing, or inadequate testing.

Ask Questions Verifying Supplement Quality:

When looking for any supplement for yourself or your pets you must ask the manufacturing company the following questions:

  • Do you inbound test your raw and/or concentrated ingredients for contaminants such as heavy metals, fertilizers, and other agricultural chemicals?
  • Do you test your ingredients, specifically active ingredients to ensure their concentrations are correct?
  • Do you source any ingredients from China? 
    • Are you willing to provide certificates of origin? 
    • Note that ingredients from China are not necessarily bad as long as they are well-sourced and they are verifying quality and purity. 
  • Do you complete analysis of your final product to ensure the formulation is correct and ensure there are not any contamination issues? This is important to ensure that active ingredients match the label.
    • Are you willing to provide an analysis for each lot/batch of your final product?
  • Do your company and products meet requirements to utilize the NASC (National Animal Supplement Council) seal?
    • I would not recommend supplement companies that are not members of the NASC, especially CBD companies.

Advice to Consumers

This is not a comprehensive list by any stretch. The key take away is that consumers should start asking questions of manufacturers in order to encourage change. The reality is that very few companies can answer these questions because most do not adequately test their products at all stages. By opening up a dialogue about the importance of doing so can help prevent future issues within the industry.

If companies are unwilling to transparently answer these questions or use the excuse of information being proprietary I would strongly suggest that you find another brand. Not being transparent or testing products when it comes to ensuring safety is unacceptable. Brands that are not meeting these standards could potentially be poisoning the market for other companies who do their due diligence. As consumers demand better.

About the Author: Nicole Cammack

Nicci is the owner of award-winning NorthPoint Pets & Company, in Connecticut. She is also the Founder & CEO of Undogmatic Inc. Her undergraduate and graduate education includes biology, chemistry, business, and nutrition. She has worked in the pharmaceutical industry on multiple R&D projects and has had the privilege to learn from leading international figures in the human and pet health industry. She regularly lectures at national conferences, including federal, state, and municipal K9 events. Her current research involves identifying pathogenic risk factors and transmission among raw fed pets through a comprehensive worldwide survey.

www.northpointpets.com
www.undogmaticinc.com

Journal of Animal Science Article Full Summary, Volume 98, Issue 6, June 2020

BACKGROUND & HISTORY OF DCM INVESTIGATION

In June of 2018, Lisa Freeman, a board-certified veterinary nutritionist from Tufts University published a blog titled “A broken heart: Risk of heart disease in boutique or grain-free diets and exotic ingredients.” This blog warned pet owners and veterinarians that ‘BEG’ (boutique, exotic, grain free) diets were causing heart disease in dogs. This left professionals and the public scrambling for more information, which was further fueled by media frenzy. As a result, the FDA launched an investigation which was complicated by sampling bias, overrepresentation of subgroups and confounding variables. For the past two years, despite additional commentary articles, scarce and vague scientific data and inconclusive FDA reports, information regarding DCM has been incomplete at best. Lack of information has been accompanied by abbreviated synopses of case studies with multiple variables and treatments, incomplete medical information and conflicting medical data and opinions from veterinary nutrition influencers.1

The reality is that there are many variables that may, or may not, impact the onset, disease process and outcome of DCM. Available studies lack evaluation of isolated variables in a controlled environment free from sampling bias. For example, many unknowns exist surrounding numerous nutrients, genetics, hypothyroidism, myocarditis, arrythmias and other diet-related etiologies.1

[vc_single_image image=”3552″ img_size=”full”]

CRITICAL PART OF THE CONVERSATION: DCM DISEASE PROCESS & ROLE OF NUTRITION

One of the largest points of contention within this investigation is that pet owners and even some within the veterinary community are unaware of the multiple etiologies and the complex relation of nutrition to DCM. Causative factors behind DCM have been oversimplified to blame grain-free foods – which is fundamentally incorrect and is a disservice to the field of nutrition and the health and wellbeing of pets.

Any self-respecting nutritionist knows that nutrients, not ingredients, make up a well-formulated diet. Nutrition is far more complex than this 2-year conversation has given credit to – and this review acknowledged that. At the same time, this paper also cited the importance of having a general knowledge of the incidence, clinical manifestations, diagnostics and potential treatments required before digging into the rest of the DCM conversation. Let’s have a look:

 

Incidence & Genetics

The most common cardiovascular disease in canines is chronic degenerative valve disease (approx. 75%), followed by DCM as the second most common. The incidence of DCM appears to be 0.5 and 1.3% of the population, with the majority of cases being an inherited, genetically linked condition.1 Certain breeds and male dogs are often reported to have a higher incidence of DCM – with most cases appearing in middle age to older dogs.1 It was thought that mixed breed dogs had a greater protection against developing genetically linked types of DCM, however statistics show this is not the case. The authors highlight the need for more research in both purebred and mixed breed dogs and the genetic relationship to DCM.

 

Manifestation & Diagnostics

Clinical manifestation, or presentation of the disease is elusive in many cases. Most dogs have no outward symptoms in the beginning stages of the disease. If undiagnosed DCM progresses on to include decreased efficiency and effectiveness of the heart muscle leading to exercise intolerance, congestive heart failure (CHF), syncope (passing out), and even sudden death. Unfortunately, sometimes there are no outward symptoms, and sudden death is the only sign, especially in Doberman Pinschers1.

The smallest section of the paper titled “Histopathological Manifestation” has one of the most interesting facts in the entire review: “Histopathological changes vary from myocardial samples in dogs with DCM, reflecting the numerous underlying etiologies.” Simply put, biopsies, or samples of heart muscle from various dogs are showing multiple and variable changes to the cardiac tissue that indicate differing causative factors. These factors could include arrythmia, genetics, hypothyroid disease, doxorubicin (chemotherapy), myocarditis, digestive impairment, low protein diets, high fiber diets and deficiencies of l-carnitine, taurine, sulfur amino acids – among many others.1

While the gold standard of diagnostics in humans, cardiac muscle biopsy is rarely conducted in canines due to the invasive nature and high cost of the procedure. Traditional diagnostics used to rule out other diseases and arrive at a DCM diagnosis include, but are not limited to radiograph(x-ray), echocardiogram, electrocardiogram (EKG), 24-Holter monitoring, and cardiac biomarkers (blood testing). Often, many of these options are limited due to accessibility due to location and the cost prohibitive nature of some of these tests.

 

Presumptive Diagnosis & Misdiagnosis

As a result of limited access to testing for various reasons, presumptive diagnosis and misdiagnosis are of concern. For example, both left and right sided valve disease may lead to characteristics that could lead to pathologies that resemble DCM. In addition, neoplasia, CHF, pericarditis and left atrial rupture can all cause pericardial effusion which leads to increased silhouette of the heart.1 Ignoring these other potential disease pathologies could lead to misdiagnosis and result in inadequate treatment.

 

Treatment of DCM

As we’ve learned within the past two years treatment of cases of DCM vary widely, and are complicated by accompanying disease states, age and nutritional status – among other factors. In general, treatment of DCM depends largely on the severity of disease. Treatment for primary DCM can involve use of pharmaceutical drugs, management of arrythmias, l-carnitine supplementation, taurine supplementation, and diet change. Management of secondary DCM may focus on treating the underlying condition in addition to the treatments listed above.1

[vc_single_image image=”3555″ img_size=”full”]

NUTRITION CONSIDERATIONS:

Choline – an abundant nutrient having several important roles within the body and potentially several that may influence DCM in different ways. In humans, choline is important for the regeneration from methionine from homocysteine. When choline is deficient elevated homocysteine elevations occur which likely increases risk of cardiovascular disease. Additional risks related to choline may be indicated by its involvement in the production of trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) which promotes inflammation and cardiovascular disease development in humans.1

This review states that choline is deserving of more research to determine if there is a relationship to DCM in canines. It’s important to call out that much of the information in the discussion on choline is from human data highlighting the knowledge gap in this area.

Methionine and Cysteine – These are sulfur containing amino acids which are involved in the synthesis of taurine. There are multiple factors that influence the synthesis of taurine from these two precursors. These influences include low bioavailability, thermal processing of food, diet formulation, deficiency of methionine which is a limiting amino acid – among others. In addition, sulfur amino acid requirements may vary between breed and size of dogs.1

Again, we need more research to determine breed, size and potentially age specific requirements for these nutrients.1 It’s also important to note that we lack the ability to measure functional adequacy of these nutrients highlighting another knowledge gap.

Taurine – Another sulfur containing amino acid, is not considered essential in dogs. This is because canines can synthesize taurine on their own. Taurine is an essential amino acid for cardiovascular function, skeletal muscle, nervous system function and as a component bile acids. Since the initial DCM investigation taurine has been questioned as being essential, however insufficient data exist to make any conclusions.1 That being said, canines with various cardiovascular diseases have been found to have low taurine levels. Further research is needed to determine if low bioavailability of taurine, low taurine synthesis and/or increased requirement of taurine are factors in these pathologies.

Taurine status is also deserving of more research. It is likely that various breeds, and disease states have different taurine requirements. In addition, several factors may influence bioavailability and synthesis of this amino acid. Variables affecting these factors need to be studied in a controlled environment.

Carnitine – Another nutrient that has been given attention is carnitine. This is because carnitine is beta-oxidized to generate continued energy, and 60% of cardiac energy production is through beta-oxidation. Therefore, deficiency or increased need of carnitine may cause cardiac dysfunction leading to cardiac disease such as DCM.1 Like other nutrition considerations discussed, functional assessments for carnitine status are lacking through blood testing. In order to accurately measure carnitine, biopsy of the heart muscle is required.

Taurine, carnitine and a variety of other nutrients and amino acids require specific balances of vitamins and minerals in bioavailable forms for proper function. Examples include, but are not limited to zinc, iron, selenium and niacin. This means that adequate levels of carnitine or taurine could be present but be unable to be utilized properly by the body.

Thiamine – Insufficient evidence exists regarding thiamine deficiency and cardiac function in canines. However, thiamine does play a role in the metabolism of carbohydrates, fats and specific amino acids. Thiamine can also be rendered unavailable by the presence of certain enzymes in some foods. In short, more research is needed to determine if thiamine deficiency, or lack of bioavailability, potentially contributes to the disease process of DCM in dogs.

Copper – Copper is known to play an important role of many enzyme functions, hemoglobin synthesis, nerve structure and function, blood vessels and various tissues. Copper deficiency on cardiac health has been studied in other species, but not dogs. While copper is routinely supplemented, it’s status could be negatively impacted by excess zinc and/or iron.1 This again indicates another knowledge gap in the area of canine nutrition and DCM.

Vitamin E – Vitamin E is a potent antioxidant which has links to cardioprotective mechanisms. Dogs with DCM have been found to have lower vitamin E in comparison to healthy dogs.

Selenium – Selenium deficiency may be related to reduced ability for cysteine synthesis. In addition, selenium deficiency results in increased oxidative stress, and decreases other antioxidant activity. Further, decreased bioavailability of selenium may inhibit the absorption of other metabolic constituents creating further complications. Additional research is needed to determine the involvement of selenium in the pathology of DCM.

[vc_single_image image=”3556″ img_size=”full”]

Heavy Metals & Other Toxin Considerations:

Heavy metals and various toxins have well documented roles of nutrient interference in humans, canines and other species:

  • Cyanide can increase the sulfur amino acid requirement
  • Certain raw foods (fruits/vegetables) can inhibit iodine function and increase risk of hypothyroid disease
  • Heavy metals such as arsenic, cadmium and mercury increase taurine requirements since taurine detoxifies these metals
Limitations in Current Available Data:

We know that DCM in dogs is not a new concern. Given that, we also know there are significant limitations to research studies currently available due to small sample sizes, sample bias, sample parameter inconsistencies, lack of complete data and known genetic predisposition. Extrapolating data from a small sample size to a large population can be highly inaccurate because subsets of populations are likely to skew results.

In addition, confounding variables and lack of control for independent variables can infer correlation when none exists.

 

The FDA Reports & Sample:

The sample population from the FDA reports resulted from a call for submission of DCM cases in dogs eating suspect (boutique, exotic, grain-free) diets. This resulted in a polluted data set for multiple reasons, including breed reporting, media attention, lack of all confirmed and suspect DCM cases reported, and other confounding factors such as health status of the dog. These confounding factors include obesity and other underlying conditions and diseases.

 

SUMMARY

As discussed, DCM has many etiologies, and many variables affecting disease manifestation. Considerable research is needed into these etiologies, and this paper largely serves as a call to action. While researchers state no definitive link can be found between DCM and ‘BEG’ diets, the largest points are that all etiologies of DCM need more investigation and science of nutrition is complex, and oversimplifying suspicions can lead to misguided and incorrect conclusions.

 

1. McCauley SR, Clark SD, Quest BW, Streeter RM, Oxford EM. Review of canine dilated cardiomyopathy in the wake of diet-associated concerns. J Anim Sci. 2020;98(6). doi:10.1093/jas/skaa155

Summary Journal of Animal Science Article, Volume 98, Issue 6, June 2020

In 2018 a blog from a veterinary nutritionist sparked a controversy between ‘BEG’ diets and heart disease in dogs. For the past two years, despite an FDA investigation, scarce and vague scientific data has created major issues for pet owners and the pet industry. For clarity, ‘BEG’ diets are known as Boutique, Exotic protein or Grain Free.

A recent article published in the Journal of Animal Science titled, “Review of canine dilated cardiomyopathy in the wake of diet-associated concerns” that appeared to be a saving grace for many advocates of ‘BEG’ diets. This paper investigated a potential association between grain-free pet food and dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) in dogs. The authors state, “based on this review of the current literature, there is no definitive relationship between these implicated diet characteristics and DCM.” Despite this statement, realize the purpose of this paper was to identify numerous knowledge gaps surrounding DCM and nutrition, rather than to draw conclusions. While no link between ‘BEG’ (boutique, exotic, grain-free) was found, this does not mean that nutrition and other considerations are not at play.

ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS:

Background of DCM & Diagnostics:
  • Approximately 75% of all heart disease in dogs is chronic degenerative valve disease, with second most common being DCM.
  • Genetics play a significant role in purebred and mix breed dogs. In addition, various genes are implicated. Certain breeds have a greater genetic predisposition than others.
  • Studies investigating the incidence rate of DCM date back to 1988 until recently. Consistently, the incidence appears to remain between 0.5-1.3% of the canine population. This is inclusive of available FDA data.
  • Diagnosis can be limited by accessibility and affordability of various diagnostic tools. Because of this, other types of heart disease could be misdiagnosed as DCM based on similar presentation.
Multiple Causations & Secondary Factors of DCM:
  • Biopsy of heart tissue shows numerous underlying causes of DCM – including but not limited to infection, inflammation, endocrine disease, heart arrhythmia, toxins and various nutritional deficiencies.
  • Nutritional considerations include fiber content, potassium, choline, methionine, cysteine, taurine, carnitine, thiamine, copper, Vitamin E and selenium. It’s important to note that a deficiency of one or more of these nutrients in direct relation to DCM is an oversimplification and fundamentally incorrect to assume. As discussed below, nutrients have varying and complex roles when it comes to metabolism.
  • Other considerations for consideration include cyanide exposure from food (cassava, tapioca), goitrogenic foods (suppress function of thyroid gland), and heavy metals.
FDA Report Considerations:
  • Boutique pet food manufacturers and exotic protein sources are likely not associated with DCM per current available data and publications.
  • Grain-free foods are also likely not associated with canine DCM, and current data shows any nutritional relationship is likely far more complex than has been portrayed.
  • More research is needed to determine risk factors for DCM including, but not limited to, infection, inflammation, endocrine disease, arrythmias, toxins and various nutritional deficiencies.
  • The FDA data pool was polluted. Meaning that it was a biased data set with subgroups (like golden retrievers, and dogs eating grain-free food being overrepresented) leading to biased conclusions.

AVMA, Nutrition & (lack of) Ethics

How many times have you heard a veterinarian or the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) preach that those who are not veterinarians should not be giving nutritional advice?  Probably more than a few times. Interesting, maybe the AVMA should take their own advice before distributing an unvalidated, unscientific internet blog. Or, maybe they should rise to meet their own ethics pillars when disseminating information which is unable to withstand basic scientific scrutiny. In short, this is a scientific body distributing subpar work that would get a student ejected from any reputable undergraduate or graduate program.

Figure 1 AVMA member email dated May 21, 2020

Unpopular fact is that most, but not all, veterinarians have a knowledge gap when it comes to nutrition, aside from the fact that the little nutrition training they receive is influenced by large food manufactuerers1,2. It is probably time veterinarians started engaging with those that went to school to study things like nutrition and biochemistry since nutrition has everything to do with pathology of disease and disease prevention. If this body continues to ignore their knowledge gap they are going to continue distributing information that is inaccurate and dangerous – which can arguably be considered negligent. Considering these issues, they should probably review their “Core Values” and realign some of their messaging. Is this bold? Sure, but it’s also the truth.

The AVMA, according to the about section of their website:

…is a professional, not-for-profit organization claiming to be the collective voice of the veterinary profession. It is comprised of over 95,000 members from government, private practice, industry, uniformed services and academia that protect, promote and advance the needs of all veterinarians and those they serve.  Their core values state that the AVMA is ethical, inclusive, science-based, animal-focused, member-centric, supportive, fiscally responsible, efficient & innovative3.

Interesting considering the AVMA has routinely made it clear that their opinion and recommendations are for purchase by major corporations such as Hill’s, Royal Canin and major pharmaceutical companies through various email and marketing campaigns – just for example (see figures 1-4)3. It is also clear that they do not regularly verify and critically review the “scientific” information they distribute to their members who take it as scientific fact4. The AVMA also continues to warn against pathogens in raw food (figure 5), most recently by citing 3 abstracts that were not peer-reviewed, and who’s conclusions either didn’t match what the AVMA claimed, or had conclusions of which data did not support5. These abstracts and their argument also are unable to withstand basic scientific scrutiny. You can read my full analysis of that incident here. Based on this alone we can toss ‘ethical’ and ‘science-based’ from their “Core Values”. Arguably there are a few more, but I’ll be nice. 

(Figures 2-4 below) Figure 5, AVMA Partnerships, accessed via AVMA website May 24, 2020. https://www.avma.org/about/avma-partnerships
Figure 6 AVMA member email dated May 21, 2020

Another example, on May 22nd the AVMA distributed a blog by “PopSugar” which was just another example of them not vetting their sources (see figure 6). This was a non-scientific article that was incomplete, inaccurate and full of dangerous nutritional information. While the blogger interviewed a veterinarian, that veterinarian made her nutritional knowledge gaps apparent. The worst part being that the AVMA shared it, in a member email, which indicates their need to expand engagement to nutrition academics and learn to admit what they do not know. 

Here are just two highlights from that article:

Consult a Board-Certified Veterinary Nutritionist:

The article stresses the importance of consulting a veterinarian or veterinary nutritionist before making food changes for your pet.  We’ve already covered the fact that many veterinarians have nutritional knowledge gaps. A board-certified veterinary nutritionist® is a Diplomate of the American College of Veterinary Nutrition (ACVN®). The ACVN® is the AVMA-recognized specialty organization for nutrition. They are veterinarians who have continued training specifically in the field of nutrition to become board-certified specialists in veterinary nutrition. This can include companion, livestock and exotic species. 

This is a great recommendation, if you can find and afford one. Most articles that advise contacting a veterinary nutritionist fail to acknowledge that there are not enough of them to go around. According to the ACVN website there are only 96 veterinarians that are currently board-certified in animal nutrition. The list narrows further because many do not take appointments with individual clients because they are working in other capacities (such as academia or formulation), not taking new clients, only see clients in person or are retired. The AVMA and ACVN know this, so one could argue that it is an unreasonable recommendation because there simply are not enough to meet demand.

This leaves nutrition advice falling onto the shoulders of veterinarians, many of which are unequipped to fully handle this field. Don’t get me wrong, there are some that are extremely capable in the field of nutrition, some of which whom I’ve been fortunate enough to learn from. The fact remains that the majority are not, and most don’t have the luxury of working with a board-certified nutritionist.

Not to mention the fact that opinions and practice among these board-certified veterinary nutritionists vary widely. Some advocate for the feeding of fresh food, some do not. Some advocate for prescription diets, some do not. The AVMA ignores this wide range of opinions and seems to focus in on those who only promote what their sponsors do. They also ignore that there are other qualified members of the scientific and nutrition communities that are qualified to make nutritional recommendations and evolve the field. So, I guess we can also cross off inclusive, supportive, scientific and efficient from the AVMA core values. 

A 1:1:1 Approximate Ratio Can Help Build A Balanced Food Plan for Your Dog:

Sounds good, right? Wrong. In fact, this is an incorrect and irresponsible recommendation on many levels that it is hard to pick a place to start:

  • It doesn’t fully explain what those ratios mean. Does that ratio recommendation mean a ratio of calories or by weight? These could yield two very different things to the unsuspecting consumer. 
  • There is no account for age/life stage, breed or size of the dog – nor does it account for activity levels which can dramatically shift energy requirements and therefore macronutrient needs. For example, what about large breeds and puppies who have specific protein and energy requirements?
  • Interesting how the recommendation is to refer to balanceit.com – which doesn’t even recommend those macronutrient ratios.
  • The recommendation completely ignores amino acid and fatty acid requirements and seems to imply that providing equal parts protein, fat and carbohydrates would supply all required micronutrients. This is simply not the case at all.

Ultimately calories from protein, fat and carbohydrates should vary based on the age, size, breed, activity level and other variables that determine daily energy requirement (DER). While it is difficult to make a blanket recommendation, here are some general points to consider:

  • According to the National Research Council (NRC) a growing puppy requires a diet that is about 29 percent protein by weight. This protein should provide about 20-25 percent of dietary calories for puppies. The NRC also states that adults need about 18 percent dietary protein6. It’s important to note that many dog foods on the market range from 18-35% of calories from protein and that more research is needed to determine what is actually optimal. 
  • Typically, a range of 5-20% of calories in commercial dog food come from fat. Although 25-50% of the daily energy requirement can be supplied by fat during periods of high caloric need such as growth, lactation, or physical exertion. Remember that fat is nearly twice as nutrient dense as protein and carbohydrates, meaning that it is easy to provide excess calories which may contribute to obesity. This recommendation can also be altered based on disease state or other metabolic factors. Too much fat can also inhibit other nutrients from being provided or metabolized properly, which is yet another factor to consider.
  • The topic of carbohydrates is a highly contested one. There is not an absolute requirement for carbohydrates in dogs – some sources state that without dietary carbohydrates, there is added strain on lipid and protein metabolic pathways to supply glucose precursors6,7. However, newer scientific literature suggests that some working dogs may do better with minimal dietary carbohydrate8. I make this point not in favor of one stance or the other – instead that the field of nutrition is constantly evolving and to highlight the need for engagement all professionals within the field.
  • Remember the primary purpose of carbohydrates in pet food is to supply energy. However, also remember that carbohydrates include both soluble and insoluble fiber; of which both can provide benefit. Fruits and vegetables provide both types of fiber also provide antioxidants. Antioxidants can prevent oxidation (rancidity) of fats, which is important – especially in higher fat diets. Further complicating matters, excess carbohydrates can inhibit various metabolic pathways leading to nutrient deficiency and/or imbalance and even metabolic disease like obesity and diabetes.

The Main Point:

Obviously, this is just barely scratching the surface, since this is such a complex topic. The main point is that this article leaves a lot of room for misinterpretation and error – aside from the fact that this recommendation is not science-based at all. This is obviously a complex topic and is deserving of those who are qualified to discuss it. Because of this, we can add additional ticks against the AVMA core values of being ethical, science-based, animal-focused, supportive, efficient and innovative.

I could go on further about some of the egregious inaccuracies and recommendations in the article, but it would be a moot point. Instead I would rather spend the remainder of my energy and your valuable time expanding upon something that is worth understanding: the science of nutrition.

The Elephant in the Room: What is the Science of Nutrition?

The field of nutrition is a complex one, and it is not explored in depth in human or animal medical school. This topic is really deserving of its own article, because many really don’t fully understand just how complex it is. In fact, the nutrition field has its own set of education and degree structures that as intense, and in some cases more intense than medical programs. Depending on the track, nutrition encompasses working knowledge of many disciplines. These include, but are not limited to biology, microbiology, chemistry, biochemistry, physics, immunology, endocrinology, pathology, and more. Years ago, the nutrition field was looked down upon by many within the scientific community. Only now is that community realizing just how fundamentally important nutrition is to health, medicine and longevity.

But This Is How It Has Always Been Done

We’re in the midst of a paradigm shift, and it is getting ugly. It’s hard for educated professionals to admit what they don’t know. It’s even harder when they get called out for disseminating bad information. However, until they start to engage those who are deserving of a seat at the table, they leave some us no other choice. On the human side we know that highly processed food, and excess soluble carbohydrates are causative factors in various diseases and comorbidities. In animals, we ignore this fact and continue to recommend highly processed foods. We also fail to recognize the role of nutrition in disease prevention and management. The dogma that veterinary medicine should remain the coveted source of recommendations for animal nutrition is one that is losing stature each day. 

Instead of refusing to engage in conversation and advance the field, the veterinary community would be better served by embracing ideas and research from those outside their immediate circle. Only then would the AVMA and the community they claim to represent begin to actually work toward what their ethics pillars state.

Nicole Cammack

Nicci is the owner of award-winning NorthPoint Pets & Company, in Connecticut. She is also the Founder & CEO of Undogmatic Inc. Her undergraduate and graduate education includes biology, chemistry, business, and nutrition. She has worked in the pharmaceutical industry on multiple R&D projects and has had the privilege to learn from leading international figures in the human and pet health industry. She regularly lectures at national conferences, including federal, state, and municipal K9 events. Her current research involves identifying pathogenic risk factors and transmission among raw fed pets through a comprehensive worldwide survey.

www.northpointpets.com
www.undogmaticinc.com

References:

1.         Albala K. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Food Issues. SAGE Publications; 2015.

2.         Nestle M, Nesheim MC. Feed Your Pet Right: The Authoritative Guide to Feeding Your Dog and Cat. Free Press; 2010. Accessed May 25, 2020. https://nyuscholars.nyu.edu/en/publications/feed-your-pet-right-the-authoritative-guide-to-feeding-your-dog-a

3.         We are AVMA. American Veterinary Medical Association. Accessed May 22, 2020. https://www.avma.org/about

4.         Just because it looks like science doesn’t mean it is. NorthPoint Pets & Company. Published April 23, 2020. Accessed May 22, 2020. https://northpointpets.com/just-because-it-looks-like-science-doesnt-mean-it-is/

5.         Apr 20 CD| NR| CN|, 2020. ECCMID studies probe resistant pathogens in pets, pet food, and people. CIDRAP. Accessed May 22, 2020. https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2020/04/eccmid-studies-probe-resistant-pathogens-pets-pet-food-and-people

6.         Read “Nutrient Requirements of Dogs and Cats” at NAP.Edu. doi:10.17226/10668

7.         Hand et. al. Small Animal Clinical Nutrition. 5th ed. Mark Morris Institute

8.         The effects of the proportions of dietary macronutrients on the digestibility, post-prandial endocrine responses and large intestinal fermentation of carbohydrate in working dogs: New Zealand Veterinary Journal: Vol 57, No 6. Accessed May 24, 2020. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00480169.2009.64718

Figure 2 AVMA member email dated May 21, 2020
Figure 3 AVMA member email dated May 21, 2020
Figure 4 AVMA member email dated May 21, 2020

Just Because It Looks Like Science Doesn’t Mean It Is

On April 21, 2020, AVMA shared a CIDRAP article on MDR pathogens in raw meat diets for dogs.

Global Pet Expo

Global Pet Expo

NorthPoint Pets & Company wins “Best Single Store Retailer” at Global Pet Expo 2020 in Cheshire, CT. Congrats!

Grain-Free Dog Food Controversy: We Need Less Marketing and More Science

Since the controversy surrounding grain-free dog food and its potential association with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), pet food companies have been working hard to market their products as safe and healthy. However, two main marketing campaigns have emerged among these companies, and they may not be entirely truthful.

The Two Marketing Campaigns: Grain-Inclusive and Grain-Free

One campaign promotes grain-inclusive products, claiming that they have always offered them, but they have now revamped, re-released, or repackaged them in response to FDA announcements regarding DCM. However, it is important to note that grain-inclusive foods do not guarantee protection against DCM, and some of these companies may be exploiting the issue for profit.

The other campaign involves companies that predominantly offer grain-free products, which may have rushed to market with grain-inclusive products in response to the DCM controversy. Unfortunately, there is not enough data on the digestibility of many of these ancient grains to support their effectiveness in preventing DCM, and some grains may even negatively impact nutrient absorption. Additionally, there are ethical and sustainability concerns surrounding some ancient grains.

Knowledge Gap in Animal Nutrition and the Need for Scientific Education

The DCM controversy highlights a significant knowledge gap in animal nutrition and the need for more rigorous testing standards and scientific education for consumers. Pet food companies have been complacent in formulating to consumer demand without adequate scientific backing, leading to misleading marketing and a lack of transparency.

Rather than pandering to consumer demand and perpetuating misinformation, companies should prioritize scientific education and transparency. Adding taurine stickers or claiming to offer ancient grains does not solve the problem and may only contribute to consumer confusion and mistrust. Private marketing companies and consulting groups should also be held accountable for contributing to the problem instead of working towards a solution.

reading pet food ingredient labelSteps towards True Transparency

Pet food companies can take steps towards true transparency by improving testing standards, educating consumers on nutrition and testing methods, and being honest about the limitations and potential risks of their products. The private marketing companies and consulting groups are also just as guilty – taking advantage of an opportunity instead of contributing to a solution. It is time for the industry to prioritize science over marketing and truly work towards improving the health and wellbeing of our pets.

Necessary Changes for Transparency

What should have been done is ask companies to make several changes leading in the direction of real, instead of perceived transparency:

  • Tell consumers who formulated your food. What are their qualifications and experience? 
  • Release both 3rd party digestibility data and 3rd analytical data for all formulas they offer.
  • Rethink before using the word proprietary with retailers and consumers – it’s certainly not an impressive or appreciated tactic and raises more questions than answers.
  • Focus on education and science: help consumers on how to understand these reports. Since data can be intimidating, don’t use it as a way to hide from answering the hard questions. And don’t use the fact that they’re complicated keep you from making them publicly available.
  • Admit that we have significant knowledge gaps that need to be addressed and examine how your company could contribute to bridging those gaps. 
    • Does that mean contributing funds to new and/or ongoing research?
    • Does that mean designing and conducting new research?
    • Or both?
  • Honesty still goes a long way, especially when it comes to our pets – nobody has all the answers!

Prioritizing the Health and Wellbeing of our Pets

At the end of the day, everyone needs a break from marketing. Retailers and consumers need to demand better. Demand that companies take time to examine, and re-examine the data, talk to the consumers and retailers in order to learn where education opportunities are – rather than marketing opportunities. Ignorance of these problems will only breed more of the same. It’s time to break the cycle.

The Challenges of Pet Nutrition: No One is “Right” or “Wrong”

While in school I was taught that half of what I was learning would be proven wrong – the problem is that we did not, and still don’t know what half is wrong. Even so, the more education I receive and the more brilliant scientists and researchers I meet from around the world, the more I realize we know very little about the world we live in and the sciences that drive it. It’s up to us to keep asking questions, keep exploring and keep challenging everything.

Grain-Free Pet Foods and Heart Disease: The Whole Truth

Summary

Pet owners and veterinarians are expressing concern over the potential relationship between grain-free pet foods and heart disease known as Dilated Cardiomyopathy (DCM). However, little research and data are available on this topic, and some industry professionals fail to recognize the greater issue at hand. DCM is just one of the many health concerns that pet owners face, including cancer, diabetes, kidney disease, and allergies.

Pet owners and veterinarians who are concerned about grain-inclusive or grain-free diets may be focused on the wrong risk. Instead, their concerns should be centered around diets that lack fresh food, narrow formulation guidelines, outdated research, and foods containing toxic chemicals and byproducts of food processing. These factors pose a greater risk, which has been scientifically proven, to the health and longevity of our pets than any isolated grain-free diet.

Feeding pets overly processed and poorly formulated foods over generations has increased their susceptibility to various diseases, leading to an increase in the prevalence of various types of diseases and conditions. This review examines the scientific evidence surrounding the complexity of the issue and offers advice to pet owners on reducing the risks of disease.

In summary, while the relationship between grain-free pet foods and DCM is a concern, pet owners and veterinarians should focus on the bigger picture. They should prioritize feeding their pets fresh and well-formulated diets to reduce the risks of various diseases and conditions. 

In this review we examine the scientific evidence surrounding the complexity of the issue, and what pet owners can do to reduce risks of disease. 

Background

If you’ve been keeping up with the news or browsing social media, you may have come across claims that certain pet foods, especially grain-free ones, can cause heart disease in dogs. However, the latest report from the FDA tells a different story, revealing a complex issue with no scientific evidence proving a causal link between grain-free diets and heart disease.

It’s crucial to understand that this issue is not straightforward, and there are multiple factors at play. Before delving into the FDA investigation and the possible association between heart disease and grain-free foods, it’s essential to address what the news media failed to do. In short, while the media has been quick to blame grain-free pet foods for heart disease in dogs, the reality is far more nuanced.[1] The FDA report is based on a limited sample size, and the agency itself admits that there is no clear evidence linking grain-free diets to heart disease. Therefore, it’s important to consider all the relevant factors before jumping to conclusions. By taking a closer look at the FDA investigation and the scientific evidence, pet owners can make informed decisions about what to feed their pets.

Before examining the FDA investigation and the facts surrounding a potential association between heart disease and grain-free foods it is important to address what the news media failed to do:

Over half of American dogs are overweight2, diabetes rates are rising faster than we can measure and cancer is becoming more prevalent not just in the old, but in the young3. Also common are kidney disease4 and liver disease5 and dogs and cats experiencing more food and environmental sensitivities and allergies than we have ever seen6. Diet-mediated dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) has affected a relatively small number of dogs from 2014 to date, approximately 524 out of an estimated 77 million dogs in the United States – as of the latest FDA report7. While this is certainly a concern that warrants further investigation in a timely manner – DCM is not by any means an epidemic. In fact, the FDA states that they believe the potential association between diet and DCM in dogs is a complex scientific issue that may involve multiple factors7.

Few Pets are Healthy

In examining the whole picture, we know that dogs and cats are not “healthy” – a reality that most of us either ignore or don’t believe to be true. Common problems like skin conditions, “dog-smell”, and GI issues are not – and should not be considered healthy; even though we’ve come to accept them as normal. Some of the causality behind “common” problems is that our pets have been, and still are, subject to many detrimental variables over generations and the consequences of such have impacted the overall wellbeing and susceptibility of varying types of disease. These variables include, but are not limited to: toxins and pollution in the air, water, soil and food supply, overuse of antibiotics and other medication, overvaccination, poor quality diet, poor breeding practices, poor nutrition, lack of exercise and radiation. It is possible that some, or more likely, each of these factors have contributed to our pet’s susceptibility to a variety of diseases, including DCM. In fact, obesity, diabetes and other issues have known relationships to DCM8 – all factors that complicate the scientific investigation.

Understanding Risk Factors

The good news is that just because an individual is “predisposed” to a particular disease does not mean that they are going to “develop” that disease9 as the expression of a “bad gene” can be altered by a healthful diet and limiting exposure to toxins and stress. Alternatively, if dogs or cats are constantly exposed to various toxins, fed a diet lacking vital nutrition, moisture and meat protein, over-vaccinated, overmedicated and deprived of exercise and are obese much like how they have been for generations, they have a significant risk10 of developing the disease to which they are predisposed to. This newer field of science, referred to as nutrigenomics, studies the nutrient impact on gene expression and nutritional influences on the Genome, Transcriptome, Proteome, and Metabolome and extract useful biological information on the data collected. This field has melded practices from Nutrition, Biology, Medicine, Genomics, and Bioinformation11.

Let’s imagine for a second that an individual was predisposed to heart disease, but they took care of themselves by consuming a dietdog fresh food bowl consisting of fresh foods, including antioxidants along with moderate fat, and sodium, avoided excess use of vaccinations, limited unnecessary medications, consumed clean water and exercised to maintain strong cardiac function. These individuals most likely have a lesser chance of developing heart disease. For the sake of not oversimplifying this concept, a healthy lifestyle for us or our pets does not eliminate the risk of disease, but it does make our genes more resilient, or resistant to letting that disease develop or advance. In 2005, the Broad Institute began mapping the canine genome, which allows us to further explore what genetic markers are related to specific diseases. This mapping project will not only help us to identify targeted pharmaceutical and nutritional therapies that may help in treatment for prevention but also help to advance knowledge, treatment, and prevention of diseases for humans12.

FDA Investigation & Reports

The FDA formally announced an investigation into grain-free dog foods potentially having a link to heart disease in dogs in July of 2018. The investigation specifically named those foods containing potatoes, legumes and pulses7. Pulses are a subset of legumes and are defined as peas, lentils, chickpeas and other dry beans13. Since there is no central reporting agency for canine disease the FDA states that it is unknown how commonly dogs develop Dilated Cardiomyopathy. However, the increase in reports to the FDA may indicate a potential increase in canine DCM in breeds not previously known to be predisposed7 and it is unclear if cases have been underreported, and continue to be underreported or if there is a significant spike in cases as a result of these diets, or multiple other variables. Dilated Cardiomyopathy (DCM) is defined as a condition where the heart becomes enlarged and is unable to adequately pump blood. DCM can include mechanical dysfunction and/or electrical dysfunction which leads to sudden collapse and death13.  As DCM progresses signs include lethargy, loss of appetite, shallow breathing, intolerance to exercise and shortness of breath. This disease is known to occur in dogs and cats, at varying levels of severity and has more than one cause14

Further complicating matters DCM has causation that is likely multivariable such as genetics, environmental, nutritional, infections, heavy metal exposure, dysbiosis, and even other unknown causes14,15. Further commentary articles, not research articles, from experts examining the issue seemed to state that there is no direct evidence showing causation between DCM and grain-free pet foods – and that it will take several years to determine what the issue or issues are. The most recent FDA report explicitly states they are investigating and gathering more information in an effort to identify whether there is a specific dietary link to the development of DCM, and based on the data collected thus far, they believe the development of DCM is a complex scientific issue that may involve multiple factors. As a result, the major pet food brands have jumped at the opportunity to sow a seed of doubt in to the minds of pet parents leading some to make unnecessary, and even health prohibiting changes.

Not Just Grain-Free Diets

It is important to note – out of some dogs diagnosed with DCM, not all dogs were consuming a grain-free diet1. Even more notable, most dogs were eating dry food in those cases reported to the FDA1, which raises the question of this not being a grain-free problem per se – instead rather evidence of a knowledge gap in formulation of processed food. As the report notes, some improved after a diet change from one grain-free diet to another, and this finding, along with the differences identified between dogs fed various grain-free diets, suggested that DCM was not necessarily tied to the grain-free status of the diet13,16. In addition, many dogs diagnosed with DCM were initially thought to be taurine-deficient, and we’ve since learned that this problem is far more complex than the presence or digestibility of taurine within a dry pet food. We’re now realizing the presence of significant knowledge gaps in regards to small animal nutrition requirements – plainly, we do not know enough about what happens to food when we process it beyond a recognizable state. 

Nutritional Knowledge Gap

The formulation of static diets is formulated from generalized minimal recommendations by the Association of American Feed Control Officials (AAFCO) and the NRC which are wholly lacking in sound and reasonable research. Static diets are defined as a diet that a dog may eat each day, for their entire life, and that food providing all the nutrition they need. These minimum nutrient recommendations have been established with research on Beagles as a proxy for all canines regardless of size or breed13. These same recommendations also place pregnant bitches in the same category as growing animals – even though we know that nutritional requirements are different. Additionally, recommendations made by AAFCO correspond to a total nutrient content within the formulation and do not consider the true digestibility of ingredients leading to the potential of a variety of nutrient deficiencies across multiple breeds17.   Available research demonstrates that the taurine, methionine, cystine, carnitine and other nutrient metabolism is varied among sizes and breeds13, all of which are variables further complicating this investigation. 

Some within the veterinary community have illogically lumped home cooked, canned and raw diets into the “grain free” category, however, per the FDA report, the vast majority of DCM cases were reported were for dogs consuming dry foods1 – not “grain-free” raw or “grain-free” cans, causing unnecessary panic at the expense of pet owners feeding responsibly formulated and safely sourced canned and raw foods. It is important for the consumer and pet-owner to understand that these diets are entirely different in formulation, composition and differ in the way they are formulated and metabolized in comparison to overly-processed dry diets. Fresh and unprocessed diets, like raw, will have abundant taurine and natural nutrients which can limit risks of malabsorption and nutrient deficiencies that are common in kibble and other processed diets. Oversimplifying this issue to “grain-free” raw, canned and home-cooked diets is irresponsible and likely causing more harm than good. 

DCM is not a ‘new’ concern for dogs or cats. In fact, it has been around for a long time. In the 1970’s -1980’s DCM was prevalent in cats and it was eventually determined that this was due to low concentrations of taurine and animal protein within the commercialized foods18. Pet food companies responded by adding taurine through supplementation and additional meat protein which has since seemed to remedy this issue19, however it leaves many other concerns unanswered. The supplementation of nutrients and addition of processed meat is still not an ideal example of adequate nutrition and another example of overly processed diets contributing to the overwhelming amount of disease in companion animals. 

Since dogs and cats are nutritionally different it is unlikely that adding taurine to any canine diet will be sufficient to solve the current issue in dogs, especially since diet-related canine DCM is likely far more complex. Further complicating matters, the only definitive diagnosis for DCM is an echocardiogram, which the majority of “cases” highlighted within the FDA report lack. Other methods of screening for potential cardiac disease are whole blood taurine, plasma taurine, auscultation, and chest x-ray it is important to understand that these methods are not reliable in the diagnosis of DCM. 

More information here

Complicated Variables

We know that certain breeds are genetically predisposed to DCM and those include (but are not limited to) Doberman Pinschers, Boxers, Great Danes, Labrador Retrievers, St. Bernards, Irish Wolfhounds, Golden Retrievers, Newfoundlands, English, and American Cocker Spaniels18,20. There is no cure for genetic DCM, and conventional veterinary treatment involves the use of diuretics, ACE inhibitors, antiarrhythmic, and other pharmaceutical agents to reduce stress on the cardiopulmonary system and kidneys to allow the body to tolerate the condition. Unfortunately, these options provide limited relief for a generally short period of time21

DCM can also be closely related to diet, meaning that an individual’s susceptibility can be influenced by diet imbalance. Initially, the assumption with current DCM concerns was a lack of taurine in the diet for varying reasons. However, it was determined that this was likely not true for most cases7 and instead researchers are now considering other factors preventing the body from utilizing taurine and other nutrients – while also keeping in mind that the issue may be something else entirely. Another theory is that one or more ingredients are interacting with others causing a blocking effect on taurine utilization. The truth is that researchers are unsure exactly what the mechanism behind this condition is19

Disproportionate Levels of Macronutrients

DCM aside, all dry foods that have a high carbohydrate content of at least 30% (grain AND grain-free) can be a problem for several reasons that most haven’t recognized:

  • Ingredients such as potatoes, peas, and other legumes and pulses have been used in grain-inclusive and grain-free dog food for nearly 25 years22,23 to provide dietary fiber and protein in limited capacity. It is recognized that use of some of these ingredients at higher than 15% inclusion on a dry matter basis can decrease crude protein digestibility. Since some foods on the market have greater than 40%, and even up to 60%, inclusion this could facilitate higher risk of nutritional deficiencies if nutrient balance is not considered in the formulation13. This can also yield inadequate amount of animal protein which may lead to an imbalance or not enough of various nutrients – one of which can be taurine, and too little taurine (taurine deficiency) can result in DCM. 
  • Some plant-based proteins, like pea or potato protein, can cause malabsorption and inflammatory conditions in humans24. While insufficient research is available to suggest the same in pets, it is certainly a reasonable theory to explore.  More and more institutions are exploring the similarities in humans and canines12,25–27 and while some still refute the similarities, the stark similarities in types and rates of disease are unquestionable. Logically, these similarities are not surprising considering that by and large humans eat a highly-processed diet full of chemicals, lack exercise, overuse of medication, and live exposed to environmental toxins and pollution, just like their pets. 

Before assigning blame to a particular ingredient, set of ingredients or formulation it is prudent first to identify knowledge gaps – especially prior to establishing any causation to a particular disease. Further investigation into these inclusion percentages and relationship to canine health and risk factors is needed to understand these relationships13. It is known that grains contain precursors to taurine – amino acids cysteine and methionine. Dogs can manufacture taurine from these amino acids, and it was always thought that taurine was not essential for canines – however individual genetics, breed, size and environmental factors may alter an individual minimum and maximum requirements for taurine and other nutrients13

Grain Complications

The pet food industry switch to grains was not exactly fueled by a problem with the actual grains, or grain allergies like most believe. Absent from the discussion on grain-free vs. grain inclusive diets for people – and pets – is the contamination of grains with herbicides, pesticides, mycotoxins, and fertilizers. There are numerous peer-reviewed articles detailing the disruption many of these contaminants have on normal gut bacteria function28,29 and these are the largest reasons more animals and humans are becoming increasingly intolerant to grain and grain products. We’re learning that disruption of vital gut bacteria balance can have devastating effects on the health of the host30,31, including diabetes, obesity, autoimmune disease, cancers, GI issues and even DCM32. The contamination of grains in pet food is likely why many pets experienced improvement of various symptoms with the change from grain-inclusive to grain-free.

Pet food can be made of everything from rendered unfit foods for human consumption to ingredients that are 100% organic and probably better than the food we feed ourselves. I’m not necessarily here to split hairs on ingredients and in the types of ingredients that are in our pet’s food. Because is it these ingredients that are causing the problem? Or is it something else? – These are the questions that the experts seem to avoid entirely. When a dog experiences issues related to food we are quick as a society to turn over the bag and blame an ingredient or set of ingredients. However, those ingredients as listed are likely not the problem – rather the quality, processing, and contamination of these ingredients; something you will never find listed on a label.

Pet Food Processing & Chemical Factors

Protein, fat, and carbohydrates go through irreversible denaturation with the heating process of making kibble. Kibble is heated to high temps which creates a chemical change. A Maillard Reaction Product (MRP) is the name for a series of reactions that is the product of sugar (or carbohydrate) and protein when heated. These are also known as AGE’s or Advanced Glycated End Products. MRP’s are responsible for nutrient loss and associated with diseases like diabetes25, cardiovascular disease33,34, kidney disease34, loss of cognitive function34,35, allergies36, periodontal disease37, and chronic inflammation38. This can mean things like arthritis, skin and ear issues, an old injury that keeps resurfacing, bloating, IBS, etc. In addition, there is a large amount of research to suggest that they are carcinogenic and accelerate aging38,39.

Heterocyclic amines are MRPs from cooking protein that increases with elevated cooking temperature. This phenomenon is more pronounced in meat than fish – and these increase with temperature and dryness of meat or meat products40.

Acrylamides are a chemical that forms naturally from starchy foods during high-temperature cooking. According to the European Food Safety Authority evidence from animal studies shows that Acrylamides are genotoxic and carcinogenic: they damage DNA and cause cancer. And since we know so little about animal nutrition is it possible that much of the disease we’re seeing – including DCM has at least something to do with the MRP’s that are in pet food?

The process of making kibble can be responsible for a dog’s inability to tolerate certain foods in processed form, and for the incidence of certain diseases. It also explains why some dogs are able to tolerate and even thrive when these foods are fresh instead of processed. We do not have enough research that fully explains what happens to food when it is processed beyond a recognizable state. Nor do we have enough epidemiological studies to understand the consequences of feeding processed food diets for generations. Unfortunately, what we do know is that DCM is not the only problem that will arise as a consequence of feeding a highly-processed diet. There will be potentially more severe and prevalent conditions that will arise.

How to Mitigate Risk

Please recognize that this does not mean that you must feed all fresh food – or all kibble. Theory always suggested that mixing fresh food and kibble would result in GI distress or cause problems over time. Fortunately, that theory no longer holds much weight. Rather, feeding vegetables and fruit that are high in antioxidants with kibble provide protective effects against MRP’s. In addition, feeding raw or cooked meat along with kibble provides amino acids, vitamins, and minerals in their most natural form. While research is in the works and isn’t yet published, researchers are finding that feeding raw and kibble together actually reduced inflammatory markers for certain diseases, when done properly. There is also a notable but non-peer reviewed case-study of a dog successfully fed fresh food and kibble which suggested that kibble may have digested at the same rate or slightly faster than raw41

Regardless of what method you choose to feed, feeding fresh food does not only mean raw or cooked meat. Fresh food such as vegetables and fruit can provide some antioxidant protection against MRP’s, provide additional phytonutrients in their most natural form and improve digestive function. In addition, consumption of green, yellow and cruciferous vegetables reduces oxidative stress which can lead to lower incidence of certain cancers, cardiovascular disease, promote liver detoxification, reduce inflammation and positively impact the function of the immune system42

Closing Discussion

The considerations surrounding DCM challenges are extremely complicated, with many unknowns. It will likely be many years before any formal answers are reached. Currently, there are no formal dietary recommendations for pet owners from the FDA as of the latest report. If your dog is in a risk group (breed, genetic or other underlying condition) it is best to seek advice from your veterinarian on the health status of your pet. Some experts are recommending adding taurine to pets’ diets regardless of what you feed19. Adding taurine can be as simple as purchasing a taurine supplement from a trusted source. Consideration of fresh foods is advised, since taurine naturally occurs in animal products – not grains – adding items like chicken breast, beef or other animal heart, sardines, raw goat milk, and other animal products may be beneficial.

Moving from grain-free kibble to grain-in kibble is not likely to solve health, longevity or other nutritional challenges as both of these groups are ultra-processed foods that carry well-documented risks highlighted within this paper. Our canines are largely suffering from man-made diseases and conditions such as obesity, type II diabetes, and nutritional deficiency – among others. Most of these can be linked back to feeding low-moisture, high soluble carbohydrate, low meat protein and ultra-processed dry food with high levels of contaminants. While there is a knowledge gap in the nutrition of both ultra-processed and raw, one cannot deny the association between ultra-processed foods and disease prevalence, and progression. It is also evident that feeding fresh foods provide at least some reduced risk of these common diseases and conditions.

It is imperative to understand and practice methods that recognize each individual animal as different, having unique needs. Not any one diet is complete – and no feeding regimen will be successful for all pets and this very practice is what has been detrimental to our pets and brought us to this point. As always, all diet changes and additions should always be introduced slowly and carefully. It is always helpful to keep a food journal that can help experts determine potential foods or feeding patterns that may be problematic.

*This article is for informational purposes only. It is not meant to provide medical advice or replace the advice of a qualified veterinarian. If you think your pet has DCM, or any medical condition please seek the advice of a qualified veterinarian.

1.Medicine C for V. FDA Investigation into Potential Link between Certain Diets and Canine Dilated Cardiomyopathy. FDA. June 2019. https://www.fda.gov/animal-veterinary/news-events/fda-investigation-potential-link-between-certain-diets-and-canine-dilated-cardiomyopathy. Accessed June 29, 2019.

2. Obesity in pets | AAHA. https://www.aaha.org/pet_owner/lifestyle/obesity-in-pets.aspx. Accessed May 15, 2019.

3. Cancer in Pets. https://www.avma.org/public/PetCare/Pages/Cancer-in-Pets.aspx. Accessed May 15, 2019.

4. Langston CE. Chapter 136—Chronic Renal Failure. In: Silverstein DC, Hopper K, eds. Small Animal Critical Care Medicine. Saint Louis: W.B. Saunders; 2009:594-598. doi:10.1016/B978-1-4160-2591-7.10136-5

5. Bexfield NH, Buxton RJ, Vicek TJ, et al. Breed, age and gender distribution of dogs with chronic hepatitis in the United Kingdom. Vet J Lond Engl 1997. 2012;193(1):124-128. doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2011.11.024

6. Marsella R, De Benedetto A. Atopic Dermatitis in Animals and People: An Update and Comparative Review. Vet Sci. 2017;4(3). doi:10.3390/vetsci4030037

7.  Medicine C for V. FDA Investigating Potential Connection Between Diet and Cases of Canine Heart Disease. FDA. February 2019. /animal-veterinary/cvm-updates/fda-investigating-potential-connection-between-diet-and-cases-canine-heart-disease. Accessed May 15, 2019.

8. Alpert MA. Obesity Cardiomyopathy: Pathophysiology and Evolution of the Clinical Syndrome. Am J Med Sci. 2001;321(4):225-236. doi:10.1097/00000441-200104000-00003

9. Hunter P. We are what we eat. The link between diet, evolution and non-genetic inheritance. EMBO Rep. 2008;9(5):413-415. doi:10.1038/embor.2008.61

10. Berenson GS, Srinivasan SR. Emergence of Obesity and Cardiovascular Risk for Coronary Artery Disease: The Bogalusa Heart Study. Prev Cardiol. 2001;4(3):116-121. doi:10.1111/j.1520-037X.2001.00537.x

11. Sales NMR, Pelegrini PB, Goersch MC. Nutrigenomics: Definitions and Advances of This New Science. Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism. doi:10.1155/2014/202759

12. Dog Disease Mapping Project (DogDNA). Broad Institute. https://www.broadinstitute.org/project-spotlight/dog-disease-mapping-project-dogdna. Published June 9, 2011. Accessed May 15, 2019.

13. Mansilla WD, Marinangeli CPF, Ekenstedt KJ, et al. Special topic: The association between pulse ingredients and canine dilated cardiomyopathy: addressing the knowledge gaps before establishing causation. J Anim Sci. 2019;97(3):983-997. doi:10.1093/jas/sky488

14. Canine Dilated Cardiomyopathy (DCM). Cornell University College of Veterinary Medicine. https://www.vet.cornell.edu/hospitals/companion-animal-hospital/cardiology/canine-dilated-cardiomyopathy-dcm. Published December 13, 2017. Accessed May 15, 2019.

15. Dilated Cardiomyopathy in Dogs. https://www.vetmed.wsu.edu/outreach/Pet-Health-Topics/categories/diseases/dilated-cardiomyopathy-in-dogs. Accessed May 15, 2019.

16. Freeman LM, Stern JA, Fries R, Adin DB, Rush JE. Diet-associated dilated cardiomyopathy in dogs: What do we know? J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2018;253(11):1390-1394. doi:10.2460/javma.253.11.1390

17. Columbus D, de Lange CFM. Evidence for validity of ileal digestibility coefficients in monogastrics. Br J Nutr. 2012;108 Suppl 2:S264-272. doi:10.1017/S0007114512002334

18. Pion PD, Kittleson MD, Thomas WP, Skiles ML, Rogers QR. Clinical findings in cats with dilated cardiomyopathy and relationship of findings to taurine deficiency. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1992;201(2):267-274.

19. DCM: add taurine to grain-free dog foods, say scientists | PetfoodIndustry.com. https://www.petfoodindustry.com/articles/8162-dcm-add-taurine-to-grain-free-dog-foods-say-scientists?v=preview. Accessed May 15, 2019.

20. DACVIM CDSBM. Breed-specific variations of cardiomyopathy in dogs. Dvm360.com. https://veterinarynews.dvm360.com/breed-specific-variations-cardiomyopathy-dogs. Accessed May 15, 2019.

21. Dilated Cardiomyopathy in Dogs. Vca_corporate. vcahospitals.com/know-your-pet/dilated-cardiomyopathy-dcm-in-dogs–indepth. Accessed May 15, 2019.

22. Butterwick R, J Markwell P, J Thorne C. Effect of Level and Source of Dietary Fiber on Food Intake in the Dog. J Nutr. 1995;124:2695S-2700S. doi:10.1093/jn/124.suppl_12.2695S

23. Rice JE, Ihle SL. Effects of diet on fecal occult blood testing in healthy dogs. Can J Vet Res Rev Can Rech Veterinaire. 1994;58(2):134-137.

24. Freed DLJ. Do dietary lectins cause disease? BMJ. 1999;318(7190):1023-1024.

25. Research by DogRisk. University of Helsinki. https://www.helsinki.fi/en/researchgroups/dogrisk-health-via-nutrition-epidemiology-and-cancer-detection-dogs/research-by-dogrisk. Published June 26, 2018. Accessed May 15, 2019.

26. The companion dog as a model for human aging and mortality—Hoffman—2018—Aging Cell—Wiley Online Library. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/acel.12737. Accessed May 15, 2019.

27. Treviño J. A Surprising Way Dogs Are Similar to Humans. Smithsonian. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/new-study-suggests-dogs-may-be-better-subjects-research-human-nutrition-180968842/. Accessed May 15, 2019.

28. Van Bruggen AHC, He MM, Shin K, et al. Environmental and health effects of the herbicide glyphosate. Sci Total Environ. 2018;616-617:255-268. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.309

29. Aitbali Y, Ba-M’hamed S, Elhidar N, Nafis A, Soraa N, Bennis M. Glyphosate based- herbicide exposure affects gut microbiota, anxiety and depression-like behaviors in mice. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2018;67:44-49. doi:10.1016/j.ntt.2018.04.002

30. DeGruttola AK, Low D, Mizoguchi A, Mizoguchi E. Current Understanding of Dysbiosis in Disease in Human and Animal Models. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2016;22(5):1137-1150. doi:10.1097/MIB.0000000000000750

31. Galland L. The Gut Microbiome and the Brain. J Med Food. 2014;17(12):1261-1272. doi:10.1089/jmf.2014.7000

32. Yoshida N, Yamashita T, Hirata K. Gut Microbiome and Cardiovascular Diseases. Diseases. 2018;6(3). doi:10.3390/diseases6030056

33. Jandeleit-Dahm K, Cooper ME. The Role of AGEs in Cardiovascular Disease. doi:info:doi/10.2174/138161208784139684

34. OLENIUC M, SECARA I, ONOFRIESCU M, et al. Consequences of Advanced Glycation End Products Accumulation in Chronic Kidney Disease and Clinical Usefulness of Their Assessment Using a Non-invasive Technique – Skin Autofluorescence. Mædica. 2011;6(4):298-307.

35. West R, Moshier E, Lubitz I, et al. Dietary advanced glycation end products are associated with decline in memory in young elderly. Mech Ageing Dev. 2014;140:10-12. doi:10.1016/j.mad.2014.07.001

36. Smith PK, Masilamani M, Li X-M, Sampson HA. The false alarm hypothesis: Food allergy is associated with high dietary advanced glycation end-products and proglycating dietary sugars that mimic alarmins. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;139(2):429-437. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2016.05.040

37. Advanced glycation endproducts (AGEs) induce oxidant stress in the gingiva: A potential mechanism underlying accelerated periodontal disease associated with diabetes—Schmidt—1996—Journal of Periodontal Research—Wiley Online Library. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1600-0765.1996.tb01417.x. Accessed May 15, 2019.

38. Prasad C, Imrhan V, Marotta F, Juma S, Vijayagopal P. Lifestyle and Advanced Glycation End Products (AGEs) Burden: Its Relevance to Healthy Aging. Aging Dis. 2014;5(3):212-217. doi:10.14336/AD.2014.0500212

39.     Turner DP. Advanced glycation end-products: A biological consequence of lifestyle contributing to cancer disparity. Cancer Res. 2015;75(10):1925-1929. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-0169

40. Jägerstad M, Skog K, Arvidsson P, Solyakov A. Chemistry, formation and occurrence of genotoxic heterocyclic amines identified in model systems and cooked foods. Z Für Leb -Forsch A. 1998;207(6):419-427. doi:10.1007/s002170050355

41. Digest this: Kibble may actually digest faster than raw. The Raw Feeding Community. https://therawfeedingcommunity.com/2015/01/08/digest-this-kibble-may-actually-digest-faster-than-raw/. Published January 9, 2015. Accessed May 15, 2019.

42. Phytonutrients and Nutraceuticals in Vegetables and Their Multi-dimensional Medicinal and Health Benefits for Humans and Their Companion Animals: A Review – SciAlert Responsive Version. doi:10.3923/jbs.2014.1.19

The Evolution of Pet Food: From Table Scraps to Extruded Kibble

In this article, we will take a look at the evolution of pet food, from the invention of the dog biscuit to the extrusion process of making kibble and the current trend of individualized nutrition.